Skip to main content
 ALL INDIA POSTAL SUPERVISORS 


ASSOCIATION(GL) RECOGNITION MAY 





  
   IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

  W.P.(C) 1827/1997

  ALL INDIA ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS

  (GENERALLINE) ..... Petitioner

  Through: Ms. Niranjana Singh and Kumar Rajesh Singh, Advocates


versus

  UOI and ORS. ..... Respondent

  Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC

  CORAM:

  
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

  
 O R D E R   10.03.2014


  CM No.3262/2014 (condonation of delay in filing restoration application)

  This is an application for condonation of delay. The delay is of
  208 days. The learned counsel for the petitioner says that the delay has
  occurred purely on account of her fault and not that of the client.
  Learned counsel submits that for a very long period of time she was not
  able to obtain necessary instructions in the matter.

  I find that there is no affidavit of the learned counsel,
  accompanying the application though. The affidavit is of Mr. Manoj
  Bhardwaj, who claims to be the General Secretary of the petitioner
  association.

  Issue notice to the respondents.

  W.P.(C) 1827/1997 page 1 of 2
  Mr. Bajaj accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He waives
  service of notice. He says that even though the delay is enormous, he
  would like to leave the decision qua the same to the court.

  Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for
  the petitioner that she was at fault and also given the fact that the
  petitioner is an association of members, perhaps getting appropriate
  instructions may have been difficult if not impossible, I am inclined to
  condone the delay subject to payment of costs of Rs.2500/- to be
  deposited with the Registrar General, Juvenile Justice Account of Delhi
  High Court. The costs will be paid within ten days from today. The
  proof of costs will be filed.

  The application is accordingly disposed of.

  CM No.3261/2014 (restoration)


  Having regard to the fact that the delay has been condoned, for the
  reason that the petitioners counsel was at fault, I intend to allow the
  application for the very same reason. Order dated 10.07.2013 is
  recalled.

  The writ petition is restored to its original number and position.

  WP(C) No.1827/1997
  List on the Regular Board according to its age and seniority in the
  week commencing 26.05.2014.

  RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

  MARCH 10, 2014

  W.P.(C) 1827/1997 page 2 of 2



Comments

Post a Comment