Skip to main content
Election Expenditure per elector up by twenty times in 2009 compared to first General Elections 
                                                                            
General Elections are held to elect representatives for Lok Sabha after normally, every five years. Every election requires a huge amount of resources and efforts, be it planning, labour, technology, and for that matter, money. From the first Lok Sabha Elections in 1951-52 till the fifteenth in 2009, it has been a long journey for democracy. Government’s expenditure on an elector has gone up manifold, twenty times to be precise, from the first General Elections to the Fifteenth General Elections. In the first elections, the Government spent Rs 0.60 on an elector whereas it went on spending Rs 12 in 2009 General Elections. Considering expenditure in absolute terms, Rs 10.45 Crore were spent in 1951-52 whereas Rs 846.67 Crore was the amount the Government spent for 2009 General Elections.

Cost wise, 2004 General Elections was the heaviest on government exchequer with about Rs 1114 Crore spent in the elections. This was the elections when per elector cost was also the highest. Government spent Rs 17 on an elector. Significantly, there was increase in the election cost by 17.53% vis-à-vis 1999 General Elections even when there was reduction in number of polling stations by 11.26%.

 In first Six General Elections, cost per elector was less than a rupee, but coming elections saw rapid growth in Election Expenditure. Keeping devaluation of money owing to inflation into account, the rise in cost could be attributed to increased level of democratic activities. Many political parties started into being; more independents were now participating. Various voter-friendly initiatives like voter awareness campaigns, distribution of voter slip ahead of election date, use of Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) for the first time in General Elections 2014, may increase expenditure further but these efforts are focussed at strengthening the very structure and values of democracy.

It may be known that the entire expenditure on actual conduct of elections to Lok Sabha is borne by Government of India. But expenditure towards law & order maintenance is born by respective State Governments.

Election Expenditure   by   Central Government for all fifteen Lok Sabha Elections is as follows:-

Year
Expenditure (In Cr Rs)
No of Electors
Expenditure per elector (In Rs)
Polling Station
1952
10.45
17,32,12,343
0.6
1,96,084
1957
5.9
19,36,52,179
0.3
2,20,478
1962
7.32
21,63,61,569
0.3
2,38,031
1967
10.8
25,02,07,401
0.4
2,43,693
1971
11.61
27,41,89,132
0.4
3,42,918
1977
23.04
32,11,74,327
0.7
3,73,910
1980
54.77
35,62,05,329
1.5
4,36,813
1984-85   $
81.51
40,03,75,333
2
5,06,058
1989
154.22
49,89,06,129
3.1
5,80,798
1991-92   #
359.1
5,11,533,598
7
   5,91,020  *
1996
597.34
59,25,72,288
10
7,67,462
1998
666.22
60,58,80,192
11
7,73,494
1999
947.68
61,95,36,847
15
7,74,651
2004
1113.88
67,14,87,930
17
6,87,402
2009
846.67
71,69,85,101
12
8,30,866
    *     Excludes J&K in 1991-92
          1989 to 2009 General Elections’ Expenditure figures are provisional
      $     Elections were held separately for States of Assam & Punjab in 1985
     #      Elections were held separately for State of Punjab in 1992
           (Source: Ministry of Law and Social Justice & ECI website)





*        Election Expenditure  New exp


                                                                                          


Source: Election Commission of India

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Duties and additional duties of Postman----for information of all supervisory cadre

  DG(P) No.11-1/2010-Admn dated 18-11-2010 NO.25-20/2008-PE-I Government of India Ministry of Communications & IT Department of Posts (Establishment Division)                                                                                                        Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg                                                                                          New Delhi                                                                                                       Dated 25.11.2008   TO              All Heads of Circles/Regions,   Subject: Additional duties for Postman/Delivery Staff.                                       On account of changes in work scenario of the Post offices brought about due to the induction of technology and primacy of business products, the duties and responsibilities of the postman have undergone a vast change. In order to incorporate these changes, the following duties are prescribed in addition to t
ENHANCEMENT OF FINANCIAL POWERS OF HSG, HSG-II AND LSG POST MASTERS ( THESE ORDERS ARE IN FORCE. NO REVISION TAKES PLACE SINCE 21 YEARS) A reference is invited to Circular No.62-8/64-CI dated 20.10.1965 delegating financial powers to HSG and LSG Postmasters to incur expenditure of a contingent nature on the following items: a) Replacing, repairing, cleaning, oiling, shifting of electric lights and fittings, fans etc. of the office in a rented building when the charge is a Government liability. b) Repairs of Department bicycles. c) Purchase of earthen pots, glass tumblers, dusters, brooms etc. d) Purchase and repairs to furniture. e) Emergent arrangements for conveyance of mails. 2. The question of enhancement of the powers were being examined in the Directorate in view of the rise in the prices and it has been decided to enhance the powers given to HSG & LSG Postmasters from Rs.30 & Rs.20/- respectively on each occasion to Rs.60/- & Rs.40/- respectively on each o
GRANT OF TA & TRANSIT (TA & TP) TO OFFICIALS TRANSFERRED ON COMPLETION OF TENURE TO THE PLACE OF THEIR CHOICE . A proposal on grant TA and transit to officials who are transferred on completion of tenure to the place of their choice was under consideration in this Directorate for sometime past.      SR-114 governs TA on transfer distinguishes between transfer for public convenience and transfer on own request.  Although transfer on completion of tenure in one office has not been specifically referred to in this rule, yet the transfer on completion of tenure is a transfer for public convenience.  On completion of tenure, the official has to be transferred out for operational reasons.  Therefore, such a transfer is mandatory, while posting to a place of choice is secondary and subject to public convenience.  In view of this posting to a place of choice after completion of full tenure may not be normally termed as a "transfer on own request" under SR-114.      It