The issue of non holding of
Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) for promotion to the cadre of Sr. Postmaster (Gazetted) discussed with the
concerned officers of Directorate in the light of memos issued by them under
No. A-34012/6/2011-DE dated 26-12-2011 & 4-58/2011-SPB-II dated 21-12-2011
and it has been told that due to pending of following CAT cases at various
benches the said examination could not held as per the calendar of examination.
|
Sl. No.
|
Name of applicant
|
OA No.
|
Circle
|
|
1
|
Priyanath Pattanayak
|
872/2011
|
Odisha
|
|
2
|
Devi Prasad Nayak
|
873/2011
|
Odisha
|
|
3
|
C. H. Vijay Gopal and G V.
Shrinivasan
|
1279/2011
|
Andhra Circle
|
|
4
|
B. Krishna
|
1314/2011
|
Andhra Circle
|
|
5
|
All India Association of
Inspectors and Asstt. Supdt. Posts, AP Circle Branch
|
1316/2011
|
Andhra Circle
|
|
6
|
All India Association of
Inspectors and Asstt. Supdt. Posts, Punjab and Haryana Circle Branch
|
1328/HP/2011
|
Punjab & Haryana
|
|
7
|
Vedprakash Sharma
|
1358/HP/2011
|
Himachal Pradesh
|
The most of cases
are said to be filled for the following relief;
1. Quash
the letter dated 3.10.2011 by which Limited Departmental Examination for
Promotion to the cadre of Sr. Postmaster (Gazetted) has been ordered to be held
on 31.12.2011 which is against the Department of Posts, Postal
Supdts/Postmaster Group B Recruitment Rules, 1987 as amended from time to time
as there is no vacant post in the quota prescribed under the rules as detailed
in the preceding paras.
2. Quash the letter dated 29.11.2011 by which the
applicants have been informed that ASPs are not eligible for appearing in the
examination.
3. Quash the Department of
Posts, Senior Postmaster (Group B Gazetted), Postmaster (Grade ‘III and
II-Group B non-Gazetted) and Postmaster (Grade I-Group C Non-Gazetted)
Recruitment Rules, 2010, i.e Postmasters Cadre Rules, 2010 run contrary to the
Postal Services Postmaster Group B Rules, 1987 as amended from time to time, as
the quota of the Inspector Line, has also been reduced from 19% and 75% by
carving out the posts.
4. Issue direction to the respondents to consider the case of the members of the applicant No. 1 Union and other applicants for promotion under these rules of 1987 in their quota and promote them from due date with all the consequential benefits and it be declared that the bifurcation of quota now carried out by the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and bereft of any discernible principle.
5. Any other order or direction deemed fit and
proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be issued in
favour of the applicants.
All the applicants and concerned Circle Secretaries
are requested to intimate the present status of their case to CHQ immediately.
Source: IP/ASP blog
Comments
Post a Comment